.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Gang Rape Club at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary in Philly?
 |
Gang Rape Club at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary in Philly?
Is that now considered an official or unofficial extra curricular activity there these days?
A Catholic priest
admitting a sexual relationship with a teen said he had been the victim of an
attempted gang rape by fellow seminarians in Philadelphia.
Testimony in a clergy-abuse case Monday also
mentioned the pope, who weighed in on the priest's 2005 censure before becoming
Pope Benedict XVI.
Documents show the priest admitted to
Monsignor William Lynn in 1992 that he had sex with the high school student for
years. A church-run hospital concluded the priest was not a pedophile, and he
stayed in ministry until the priest-abuse crisis broke in 2002.
There was no follow-up testimony on the
seminary rape allegation. The Philadelphia archdiocese runs St. Charles
Borromeo Seminary, but can't comment because of a gag order.
Lynn is charged with endangering children by
keeping predators in ministry.
(How do you spell cesspool of moral corruption, the whole (?) hierarchy of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia?)
Sunday, April 22, 2012
The Papal Foundation – The Pope’s Slush Fund
While something
important and moral was going in the secular court system of Philadelphia this
week, the pope’s bagman, Bishop Bransfield was in Rome doing the grand tour
with all the rich little old ladies who gave so generously to the pope’s private
slushfund/charity this year. No doubt some real charity gets done with some of these funds but one has to wonder why money
cannot be directly contributed to Vatican Charities and why the Pope needs
funds out of the mainstream accounting system of the Vatican. Sounds a little
bit like Nixon and his secret stash of cash for the sake of politics to me.
The official story is
something like the pope presents a wish list of all the charities he wants to
fund and the American Bishops gather around and vie for favor with the pontiff
to get rich catholics to donate money to this fund. The so-called Peter’s Pence fund collected
once a year at mass for the upkeep of the Vatican is for the ordinary catholics
in the pews, the people that don’t really count because they don’t have the
swag to impress the big boys in the hierarchy.
Peter’s Pence was
organized by the crazy pope Pius IX after he locked himself up in the
Vatican and lost his income form slave run territories in Italy. One or two old papal palaces in
Rome itself but he withdrew from the new secular government of Italy now
centered in the capital city of Rome.
Pius found the most secure part of the Vatican in the highest place in
the Vatican, the treasury way up in the sky. How Feng Shui. To this day, the papal apartment shares floor space with that old
treasury that houses golden tiaras, chalices and jewels centuries old. No doubt a pope in need to escape the Vatican
wants some bling to take along to find digs in a safer place in case of emergencies, angry crowds etc.
The Papal Foundation was
founded by Caridinal Krol of Philadelphia, the Polish American from Chicago
whose own ambitions to become pope ended when he realized that a Karol Wohtyja
of Poland was a better politician and no doubt backed by the CIA in terms of being
a pawn to win the so-called cold war. John Paul I was no doubt in the way to
that CIA gameplan? Just speculation on
that point.
The Papal Foundation do
doubt funded many dissident groups in Poland and contributed to the downfall of
the Iron Curtain. All well and
good. But now that Benedict the German
is pope, the same fund is used for “charity” same as wink nod, JPII used it for
“charity”.
In a way, Cardinal Krol
and his corrupt regime operating out of the office building that he built at
222 N.!7th Street behind the Cathedral in Philadelphia needed
influence in Rome, in corners of the Vatican when his mismanagement of the Child
Abuse situation in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia got out of control as
evidenced decades later by civil authorities having to try and take control of
the criminal enterprise of child abuse and cover up at “222”.
So, the more you give to
the Pope and his crony charities, if they are real, the more influence you have
in the Vatican to cover up crimes against children? How do you spell Marcial
Maciel?
"Follow the money."
"Follow the money."
Friday, April 20, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Bishops Bransfield Delivers the Goods to Benedict XVI
Vatican Radio 4/19/2012:
“Each year the wish list
gets longer and longer..its' really a wonderful opportunity for the Pope and he
responds throughout the world! He doesn't restrict it" says Bishop Michael
Bransfield of Charleston-Wheeling, West Virginia, President of the US charitable
organisation the Papal Foundation.
They are the lay Catholic men and women from across the US who each year gift the Holy Father a 'wish list', in short the funds to carry out or sponsor charitable works that are particularly dear to him. On Saturday the Foundation members - who are known as Stewards of St. Peter - will meet with the Holy Father and present him a donation of over 8 million dollars to fund projects throughout the world.
Bishop Bransfield who is accompanying the Stewards on their annual pilgrimage to the See of St. Peter, says they “see this as a vocation, they see this as their ability to help the Holy Father to do things that otherwise he simply wouldn’t be able to do”...
Q: Quite a big difference in the case of the Papal Foundation, how did it all begin?
A: “Early in the 1980’s JPII had a lot of charities that he was not able to fund and a lot of concerns in Easter Europe and throughout the world. So Cardinals and Archbishops who were his friends…Cardinal Krol and Cardinal McCarrick got together and set up a foundation, it started in Philadelphia but immediately spread throughout our country because the Archbishops and Cardinals backed them up and brought in members”.
Q So how does it work?
A: “They put together this organisation and asked these people, who really are from all over the States, to give a million dollars each that would stay in the United States and the money that came from that, the income and different grants would come to the Holy Father for the poor of the world and for his charities or works that he wanted done. [The Pope] sends a list over and in November we meet in Washington and its reviewed by the grants committee and then again by the board and they approve what they can fund and what they can do for the Holy Father because the wish list gets longer and longer”.
They are the lay Catholic men and women from across the US who each year gift the Holy Father a 'wish list', in short the funds to carry out or sponsor charitable works that are particularly dear to him. On Saturday the Foundation members - who are known as Stewards of St. Peter - will meet with the Holy Father and present him a donation of over 8 million dollars to fund projects throughout the world.
Bishop Bransfield who is accompanying the Stewards on their annual pilgrimage to the See of St. Peter, says they “see this as a vocation, they see this as their ability to help the Holy Father to do things that otherwise he simply wouldn’t be able to do”...
Q: Quite a big difference in the case of the Papal Foundation, how did it all begin?
A: “Early in the 1980’s JPII had a lot of charities that he was not able to fund and a lot of concerns in Easter Europe and throughout the world. So Cardinals and Archbishops who were his friends…Cardinal Krol and Cardinal McCarrick got together and set up a foundation, it started in Philadelphia but immediately spread throughout our country because the Archbishops and Cardinals backed them up and brought in members”.
Q So how does it work?
A: “They put together this organisation and asked these people, who really are from all over the States, to give a million dollars each that would stay in the United States and the money that came from that, the income and different grants would come to the Holy Father for the poor of the world and for his charities or works that he wanted done. [The Pope] sends a list over and in November we meet in Washington and its reviewed by the grants committee and then again by the board and they approve what they can fund and what they can do for the Holy Father because the wish list gets longer and longer”.
.
Bishop Bransfield of W.Va. Joins Bishop Finn of K.C. in Exclusive American Bishops Abuse Club
Monsignor Quirk, a sought after material witness in the Philly
Monsignor Lynn Child Abuse Trial, works for Bishop Brainsfield.
What a strange coincidence?
A West Virginia Judge has
refused to honor a Pennsylvania subpoena for Quirk hiding out in Bransfield’s West
Virgina Bishopric bailiwick.
Another
strange coincidence. How do you spell conspiracy?
(crossing a state line)
TODAY: Bishop Bransfield denies sexual abuse accusations
The witness in the Philadelphia trial told the jury he
saw Bransfield bring several boys to a Scranton, Pa., farm owned by former
diocese priest Stanley Gana more than 30 years ago.
The man said Gana told him Bransfield was having sex
with one of the boys.
The witness told the jury Gana raped him for years and
that Gana and Bransfield were close friends. He said Gana once sexually abused
him during a visit to Bransfield's New Jersey beach house.
Another witness testified that Bransfield had a lewd
conversation with him.
Details of the testimony were circulated in various
media reports Wednesday.
.
Material Witness in Lynn Child Abuse Trial Msgr. Quirk under Protection of Bishop Bransfield in W. Va Diocese – Sanctuary!
 |
| You can't touch me. I am in West Virginia. Sanctuary!!!
Out of state witness Monsignor Michael Quirk is not available per
West Virginia judge who does not think that Philly Child Abuse trial has
anything to do with West Virginia. Duh!
According to Blessington, an unnamed West Virginia judge has
balked at honoring the district attorney's "material-witness
petition" for Msgr. Michael Quirk, one of three church judges who heard
the 2008 canonical trial of Brennan on child sex-abuse charges.
Brennan is a defendant in the Philadelphia criminal trial
for the rape of a 14-year-old boy in 1996, an assault he has denied.
On trial with Brennan is Msgr. William J. Lynn, who as
secretary for clergy of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia from 1992 to 2004 was
responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse of minors by priests.
Lynn is the first church official to be criminally charged with enabling or
covering up the allegations.
The prosecution in the trial, now in its fourth week,
maintains that the Philadelphia Catholic Church had a long-standing pattern of
trying to avoid scandal at the expense of the priests' past or future victims.
As part of the trial, Blessington has said he wants to
present testimony from Quirk about Brennan's testimony during the 2008
canonical trial.
Although the canonical trial was in Philadelphia, Quirk is
assigned to the Diocese of Wheeling-Charleston, W.Va., where he is judicial
vicar and assistant to Bishop Michael J. Bransfield.
A week ago, prosecutors approached Sarmina at the end of a
trial session and asked for her to write asking the West Virginia judge to
honor the petition from a Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court.
Although state court subpoenas usually have no effect on
other state's courts, they are often honored as a matter of courtesy among
judges.
The West Virginia judge has apparently decided that Quirk's
testimony would not rise to the level of being a "material witness"
and has not honored the petition.
.
|
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Philadelphia Archdiocese - Monsignor Lynn Trial - Passion Perversion
Passion perversion allegedly hushed up
A Philadelphia jury heard Tuesday about Catholic schoolboys who
said they had to strip before a priest and endure whippings as they played
Christ in a Passion play.
Prosecutors pursuing a child-endangerment case against Monsignor
William Lynn for allegedly helping the Roman Catholic church cover up the
sexual abuse of children by priests said the Rev. Thomas J. Smith remained in
ministry despite those 2002 accusations.
Church officials and an in-house review board didn’t think Smith
was after sexual gratification when he allegedly had boys undress or get naked
with him in a hot tub.
.
Hitler and Stalin were Catholics Bishop Jenky – Obama is not a Catholic – Thank God!
 |
| "Fat Danny" Jenky - Bishop of "All You Can Eat" Peoria Illinois Hate is Good |
Forgive me for my political incorrectness in face of Porky the Pig rhetoric of a G.O.P. (God's Own Party) hater, racist and operative "bishop" Daniel Jenky in a USCCB approved, orchestrated hissy fit against the Black President - Barack Obama.
Hitler never renounced his Catholic faith in his public lifetime. Stalin was a product of the Jesuits. What a surprise. This Jenky clown cannot respond to that but he can attack (wink, nod) the legally elected President of a democracy.
Talk about Jumping the Shark and breaking God’s and Godwin’s
Law!
"The Church will survive the entrenched corruption and sheer incompetence of our Illinois state government, and even the calculated disdain of the President of the United States, his appointed bureaucrats in HHS, and of the current majority of the federal Senate . .
Hitler and Stalin, at their better moments, would just barely tolerate some churches remaining open, but would not tolerate any competition with the state in education, social services, and health care.
In clear violation of our First Amendment rights, Barack Obama – with his radical, pro abortion and extreme secularist agenda, now seems intent on following a similar path."
Now go off and bankrupt another “all you can eat” restaurant instead of spreading your catholic Hate bishop Jenky!
BELCHH!!!
Or is that a fart Danny boy?
(Hey, I had to interject some humanity, laughter, something "Jesus" into this one way conversation from above at the Bishop's mansion.)
.
Mormons, Catholic Bishops and Boys on the Side
In these days of Orwellian Speak, MSM and the last days of
Constantine’s Kristian Army Religion, it is sometimes difficult to communicate
on a real eye to eye, in your face, in the gut with feelings to or with your “neighbor”.
In such an environment let me talk parable and or metaphor
and start by talking about a chick flick
and work my way around reality and try to make a point in old fashioned common/farm
sense for us older types without all our fingers engaged on a joy
stick/keyboard.
Back when or thereabout in time, AIDS was denounced by the living cadaver president
Saint Ronald Reagan as being a punishment from God or some such similar
scripted rhetoric from that “B” actor, I saw the movie Boys on the Side http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112571/
with Whoopi Goldberg, Mary-Louise Parker, Drew Barrymore and Matthew McConaughey
wearing a shirt.
Whoopi, who is an original, seems to have played a lot of
Lesbian parts in Hollywood to establish a career there or maybe this was her
only gay part.
Mary-Louise Parker in this movie along with Angels in
America http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0318997/
seems to have put her safely in the must
see by gays actress category at the box office.
And who cannot love
Drew Barrymore? Did I mention McConaughey, still early in his career, had to
keep his shirt on while “acting”?
Well anyway, getting back to my beloved dumbed down America
and Hollywood’s approach to trying to educate the American public on the facts
of the AIDS Virus. To in essence have an
innocent like Mary-Louise Parker catch that life threatening, life killing
virus, through straight heterosexual sex. That, rather than doing the whole gay scene thing through which that
infection made its presence known on the North American and European
continents.
First, I liked this chick flick, Boys on the Side, mainly
for the scenery in Arizona, where much of the movie was filmed. It was filmed in and around Tucson and having
lived there I enjoyed the movie cuts that put certain timeline and geographical landmarks out of sequence as in a typical movie filmed in Manhattan where being in a taxi cab at Lincoln Center in one scene makes it
virtually impossible to have actors do a two minute conversation and exit at
Wall Street etc.
Hollywood’s MSM Orwellian Speak
approach to educating dumbed down America only scratched the surface in the
human tragedy of the AIDS plague.
Which brings my parable to the above
pictured “baptisimal” device in the basement of the Great Temple in Salt Lake
City.
It looks quite Pagan, a lot like the
circus statuary in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome. It supposedly takes a description of Solomon’s
Temple from Book of Kings 1, and from all the translations I have read a poor translation, for molten
metal in “molten sea” in the manufacture of bronze of similar oxen described
during the Babylonian Captivity when a lot of the Hebrew Testament first got
manufactured, first written down IMO, in retro fitting the Hebrew past into words to a people in
cultural crisis and in fear of losing that cultural identity exiled in a foreign
state.
Well anyway, Jesus in the Greek
Testament got baptized in the Jordan Creek/River depending on the translation
of creek and or river etc.
The difference between the real Jesus
and his teachings and the Mormon faith is something like the difference between
the River Jordon in the sunlight and five tons of Bronze supporting a marble bath tub in some dark secret basement in Salt Lake City.
This brings me to my gripe.
First, I have some relatives that
have in the past converted to Joseph Smith's Horse Stealing Religion of
Mormonism. Constantine had his
perversions, murdering his rival general son and of course perverting the
teaching of Jesus, merging them with Roman Pagan Sacred Tradition. And Joseph Smith perverted Constantine’s idea
of religion and found gold tablets in upstate New York (like winning the
lottery in spiritual terms, possible but with the odds, highly unlikely).
As such, I hope that my parents,
grandparents, great grandparents have not being re-baptized or been forced to
participate from the grave of in a post
mortem Mormon baptism (necromancy) for the sake of propaganda to constantly
prop up the Joseph Smith myth, myths, (sodomite rumors?), that kept following him all his life as he moved
around a lot ahead of the local sheriffs and the local farmers missing their
horses and the occasional odd sheep (emphasis on the word odd). Forced to be baptized, post mortem, in a Demonic
looking device such as the above.
All this fuss in the Mormon church
and the Catholic church about marriage is just a cover story. While it is
debatable if Jesus was gay (let’s ask Mary Magdalene on that one), the male hierarchy
of Temple Square in Salt Lake City and Saint Peter’s Square in Rome are such
homophobes, that I truly suspect that Joseph Smith was light in his loafers and
the whole sacred marriage tradition is merely cover for closeted gays and
closeted gayness to hide behind so-called sacred heterosexual marriage.
Now that the Mormons “Male” hierarchy
has joinned Roman Catholic “Male” hierarchy at the hip(?) in this hate campaign
against gays and against the civil right issue of marriage equality, I wonder
why the MSM is of late advertising Salt Lake City as the "most gay friendly city
in America" except that maybe "they" want to blend in with the tourists (gay) on
weekends at their new City Creek Center gay tourist trap next to the Temple and
that demonic baptism Halloween decoration device used to baptize dead Holocaust
victims on a regular basis and now unofficial closeted manner (we’re sorry, we’ll
stop, yeah right).
While the Mormons can deny that
polygamy still exists on an official basis, the unofficial basis says
otherwise. And what better way to hide the facts
of polygamy in the western United States than to deny “marriage” to the evil
gays who don’t understand the whole straight, heterosexual, missionary sex Kristian/Mormon thing.
And of course the Catholic Bishops
are married to the church and cannot marry women (yuk!) as actually written in the
Greek Testament as a requirement to be a bishop, they can back up the Mormon
Front on Marriage and “religious liberty” MSM public relations Orwellian speak
thing.
So life is good for the Mormon Hierarchs and
the Catholic Bishops these days.
Mormons. Catholic Bishops. That Official Marriage thing (Bullshit!).
And Boys on the Side.
And Boys on the Side.
.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Rich Man’s Club, the Senate, Shoots down Buffet Rule Tax Idea
.gif)
The Senate, a rich man’s club, rejected a new
idea, the “Buffet Rule” whereby Millionaires would be forced to pay a fairer share
of the taxation burden currently carried by working America.
Any new idea is rejected by the Senate because
it is 1) New and 2) an Idea.
Long live the dumbed down Senate. Duh!
The US Senate has
blocked President Barack Obama's proposal to raise tax rate on those earning
over one million dollars a year.
The wealth tax bill is
largely considered a key element of Obama's re-election campaign and part of
the broad plan for long-term deficit reduction.
Despite the Democrats'
majority in the Senate, the lawmakers voted with a final tally of 51-45 Monday,
falling short of nine votes to move the debate on the so-called "Buffet
Rule" forward.
The "Buffett
Rule", named in a reference to Warren Buffett, the billionaire investor
who has repeatedly complained that the richest Americans generally pay a
smaller share of their income in federal taxes than do middle-income workers,
was intended to impose a minimum 30 percent tax rate on annual incomes beyond
one million dollars.
.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Pentagon Secret Service Drugs and Whores Scandal in Colombia
 |
| No. I don't take coupons Gringo. |
Who is protecting the POTUS ASSHOLES????????????????????
Another COVER UP – WHITEWASHING forthcoming in the MSM?
CARTAGENA, Colombia — Five U.S. military members
have been ordered confined to quarters over possible involvement in
inappropriate conduct at the same hotel here as the 11 Secret
Service personnel sent home in an unfolding scandal
involving local prostitutes….
The Secret Service confirmed Saturday night that 11 of its
staffers assigned to the trip have been placed on administrative leave as the
investigation proceeds into dealings between prostitutes and U.S. government
personnel preparing for President Barack Obama’s arrival at the Summit of the
Americas in Colombia.
“The
nature of the allegations, coupled with a zero tolerance policy on personal
misconduct, resulted in the Secret Service taking the decisive action to
relieve these individuals of their assignment” and send them home, Secret
Service Assistant Director Paul Morrissey said in the agency’s most detailed
statement to date.
“The personnel involved were brought to Secret Service
Headquarters in Washington, D.C., for interviews today. These interviews have
been completed,” Morrissey added. He called the administrative leave “standard
procedure [that] allows us the opportunity to conduct a full, thorough and fair
investigation into the allegations.”…
.
No Apologies to Meryl Streep - The Iron Lady is a Shite Movie
I admit
to having this love hate thing with Meryl Streep over the years. I never paid much attention to her career even
though the NYT film critics were constantly reporting her latest triumph over
the years. I have no sexual attraction, fantasy/sexual tension (?), towards the actress or the personalities she has portrayed over
the years.
It
took me literally thirty years to see Deer Hunter which was her first stellar
part. I think I formed a wrong opinion
of her perhaps after seeing Kramer vs. Kramer in a theater with a
girlfriend. I perhaps equated her
performance with the real life relationship that was shaky and ended after that
movie quite literally.
I
perhaps also had mistaken Ms. Streep for one of these chameleon actors like Keanu
Reeves whose film performances seems to only reflect those he acts with rather
than the performance itself. I perhaps
mistook Meryl’s performance as a chameleon thing along side Dustin Hoffman’s
performance in Kramer vs. Kramer.
In every movie he does, Dustin Hoffman plays
Dustin Hoffman to this day. There is
that annoying point in every Hoffman performance where he does that nasal thing
in his voice, a metaphor for his maximum method “acting” effort thing and the
rest of the performance returns to simply low point Dustin fare (mumbling). (There can only be one Brando Dustin.)
I
did not see Sophie’s Choice when it came out.
It seemed a chick flick and there is a saturation point in any life
regarding seeing another Holocaust related story.
My
real and eternal admiration came in the movie Silkwood. Saw it with some friends, had not heard of
the movie ten minutes before I went in to see it. Then on the way out, I saw a movie poster and
saw that the admirable performance of the actress in that movie had been Meryl
Streep. My jaw dropped. I saw a movie, liked the performance, and did
not know who the actress was; perhaps I was a bit tipsy. I then and there conceded that Meryl Streep
was a very good actress but remained no great fan.
In
her later years, I have seen wonderful performances of Streep in movies on TV
and not in the movie houses. I will not go on about which flicks I liked of
hers over the years or why.
I
did last night pay to see her performance on Cable TV in her latest Oscar
winning performance in the Iron Lady.
She deserved the Oscar for it as a seasoned character actress of the first
class kind in the old Hollywood definitions of such.
I
must say however that the script and the storyline of The Iron Lady is Shit.
I
was expecting a sympathetic performance of the cold calculating ambitious
British politician of Margaret Thatcher. I was sadly disappointed.
This
is the sort of movie you do after a famous person is dead to invoke
sympathy. No doubt the movie financed
with Brit cash is an attempt to make Margaret Thatcher palatable after all
these years among the population. Propaganda flick Meryl? And an attempt to quell the numbers, millions
of Brits, who will literally be dancing in the streets on the day of her actual death?
Good
performance. Bad script. Worthless subject matter.
I
will say in retrospective that perhaps Dementia in Lady Thatcher’s case or Alzheimer’s
in Ronald Reagan’s case is perhaps caused by people who never practiced
thinking in their lifetime. Never formed
an original thought in their lives. Not a nice thing to say.
Don’t
pay money to see this movie and you won’t need any Kleenex if you do. (Dry. Very dry. Two drops of vermouth worth.)
Deer Hunter http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077416/
Kramer vs. Kramer http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079417/
The Iron Lady http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1007029/
.
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Is Mitt Romney Self-Insured for his Healthcare?
 |
| Self-Insured Mitt Romney? |
With his refusal to participate in Medicare, where does Mitt
Romney get his healthcare? He, like all
the rich self-insure themselves. Some
interesting questions here.
Are his children working or just living off the family
fortune stolen at Bain Capital? That’s five sons and sixteen grandchildren in need of healthcare protection. But the rich are not like the rest of us.
Self insurance is little more than putting aside cash for
emergencies and drawing down on it in time of need. Statistically and like any insurance company,
the odds and amounts are fairly predictable. In the case of a Romney, he goes
to a hospital and pays and or negotiates what he is willing to pay and the
hospital accepts or renegotiates the offer etc.
Cheaper than going through middle men health care providers sometimes. And take a tax loss when the medical bills get really high. Just like business bookkeeping. Win-Win for the rich.
I see in the below article that Mitt does not treat healthcare premiums on his income taxes as real healthcare as much as he treats it as a nuisance tax to claim residence in Massachusetts that under RomneyCare, health insurance is a mandated law.
http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/the-tax-deduction-mitt-romney-did-not-take/
I see in the below article that Mitt does not treat healthcare premiums on his income taxes as real healthcare as much as he treats it as a nuisance tax to claim residence in Massachusetts that under RomneyCare, health insurance is a mandated law.
http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/the-tax-deduction-mitt-romney-did-not-take/
Why all the secrecy about Mitt’s wealth and how it works for him and how if elected President, he can scrap Medicare because he is too rich to care about the rest of the citizens of a republic?
Kind of reminds me of 2008 when he was running and one
journalist asked his sons if they were going to serve their country in the
military. Their response was that they
were serving their country by working in Mitt’s campaign. Geez.
Milk. Cookies. Mormons and the death of civility, reality and patriotism in America.
.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Ann Romney - Mormon Women Have No Choice
 |
| Mitt and Ann Romney |
Mormon women have no choice about anything except marriage and children and more children.
Ann Romney: I’m Running as a Mormon Wife For Pete’s Sake!
http://www.politicolnews.com/annromney-im-running-as-a-mormon-wife-for-petes-sake/
.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Ann Romney – not your typical stay at home Welfare Queen
 |
| Some Moms just don't need to work. |
What is the difference between Ann Romney and a welfare queen?
A welfare queen can only afford one Cadillac.
Mitt Romney – not your typical
job creating business man.
What is the difference
between Mitt Romney and a real GOP Presidential candidate?
Good Question.
 |
| Fill the tank up with premium boy. I am in a hurry. We're re-baptizing Atilla the Hun today. . |
Catholic League's Position on Male Body Waxing
Bill Donohue aka the Catholic League over at his local He-Man Women Hater's Irish Pub, his drinking buddies don't go in for body waxing or bikini waxes for guys. Oh well. Where does he stand or wax on this critical modern church matter?
Catholic League aka Bill Donohue now tweets on Twitter.
His eminence Dr. William A. Donohue speaks Canon Law for the
Archbishop (?) in tweet:
Catholic League – NYT says Bikini wax for men is the new rave. Not with the Irish pub guys I hang out with. Bet I know who’s loving it.
LMAO – Does Bill have a heart shaped pube for you know
who? Business as usual at 452 Madison
Ave. Get out the umbrella! Uncle Franny Spellman in heaven is pissing
himself laughing on that one Donohue!
You're a funny guy Bill. Yes you are.
.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
USCCB’s Ideal Thomas More, Heretic Burner, Book Burner, Patron Saint of "Religious Liberty"
 |
| Convicted of Corruption |
Bishop Lori in
conjunction with his top man, USCCB President Timothy Dolan, is issuing some
sort of Catholic Fatwa against President Obama, the legally elected Chief
Executive of the United States.
Starting June 21 to July
4th they will be building bonfires and preaching hate toward Obama as part of
some sort of Pagan Catholic religious festival dedicated to "religious liberty"
fashioned in the image of “Saint” Thomas More who in his day burned Lutherans
and Books for good King Henry VIII, Founder of the Church of England.
After he got caught
stealing from the treasury, Thomas More suddenly got religion, RC religion that
is, against his lawful king and got his head chopped off for corruption in high
office.
One has to wonder if one
day we will take examples of traitors and corrupt Church Officials, and re-enact in some hoped for future morality plays their criminal trials and convictions, exampled by corrupt traitor Church Ladies types presently with us like Lori and Dolan - a third rate USCCB Vaudeville Act?
.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)