A pattern
emerges as I look at the objects of my youth. A thought occurs to me as I look at the
discarded by the RCC the once sacred objects of my youth before they are
decommissioned from the so-called “sacred” thing and sold as scrap or recycled
into other churches.
That the death of my childhood parish and its church is not unlike
the death of Jerusalem and the destruction of the Hebrew Temple in the year 70
C.E..
And like the
Jews who only had one Temple, I only had one church building / temple and once destroyed I have
to reassess the purpose of faith as learned in that temple in Philly. That what
ended up from humble beginnings time traveling to the present, transpired into what is now generally called “Christianity” in the
final form as authorized by the Emperor/God Constantine circa 325 C.E..
* *
*
I also cross
reference this with two of my blog articles, one about the parable of the
mustard seed and a quick mention of an Internet “News” item about the science
and the domestication of camels in the bible.
The article about
Camels generated a spam like comment from a fundamentalist type that is doing
damage control regarding the article about the timeline of domesticated camels not being in
Palestine at the time that Abraham and Jacob and such were supposedly using
them in standard bible stories. I say spam like but since the comment was
polite enough and had a return e-mail address I did not delete it. I welcome
all reasonable comment even if I disagree with it.
I
incorporated my own bit of personal opinion in response to the comment on the
camel which with a displayed link (not connected), it was a fundamentalist argument
that there were petroglyphs in Palestine at the so called timeline of Abraham
and Jacob proving that the bible is written by a singular author labeled “God”.
Problem with
the petroglyph argument is that objects like petroglyphs can be forged and I am
not certain if they were also trying to use science regarding carbon dating in
that argument. Using science when convenient and not always is unsound
methodology or use of the science thingy.
My own bit
of personal opinion to that comment was an article regarding the Parable of the
Mustard Seed,that with a
little bit of research had me conclude that that parable was written from a
middle class Greek or Roman point of view and local to Rome or Athens and not one of an honest street view
of the historic time and person of Jesus.
* *
*
Getting back to the loss Saint Joan of Arc Parish in Philly in favor of Holy Innocents Parish, the
political parish with some off street parking for the Archdiocesan officials to
visit and inspect with their Wharton Global Spreadsheet to determine
what parish gets boarded up and torn down and which once survives in bland modern
functionality. Whatever.
Now that the
only lost temple or church I count as important in the culture of my life and progeny, I looked at a picture of the baptismal font from pictures of the Last Mass at Saint Joan of Arc before they board up the place and turn it into a tire warehouse or such. Can you imagine Caesar
trying to turn Herod’s temple into a parking lot for chariots before 70 C.E.?
Well looking
at that font, I am reminded that it used to be in a side out of the way room
with stained glass, the baptistery. That in the decades since I attended
services there, they had apparently moved the baptismal font out into the open
of the church and amidst the congregation and out of the dark forgotten room of
the old architectural design.
That baptism
cross referenced with John the Baptist and he baptizing people in the river
Jordan put me into mind of the middle class Greek and or Roman writers of the
Greek and or New Testament.
That in all
probability John the Baptist is ideally depicted in the midst of crowds, mostly middle class, in the countryside
doing the Jewish cleansing with water thing.
That there
are purifying bathes all around the Jerusalem Acropolis and the Temple building
but I would imagine such baths required a fee and maybe a good second suit of
clothing to go play holy on the mount and be seen by your other middle class
neighbors doing their holy stroll around an Easter Sunday Fifth Avenue local like setting so to
speak.
That much of
the fire of the historic Jesus is a man, a day laborer, preaching to street
people, poor farmers, in their only set of clothes etc. That John the Baptist is more like
catering mostly to poor people in the heartland. These poor wanting a place at the table of
the God Creator thing and John did not charge much if at all with a diet of
grasshoppers etc.
That aside
from a handful of curious tourists, John the Baptist like Jesus that followed
him, was a preacher to the poor and disaffected and not the Middle Class people
in the big city of Jerusalem.
That many of
the paintings coming down to us from the Renaissance had John pictured with a
middle to upper class of clientele.
While this
level of poverty reached by John the Baptist’s mission is not verbally specific in the
bible, not codified by middle class writers in Alexandria, Athens or Rome, the truth of
the situation seems much clearer to me.
That even too with the visual media of stained glass etc. from the middle ages onward, the most readily available means to tell a bible story, that the story in the visual form could be interpreted and or have the message hijacked away from that of the poor multitudes down to vested middle class elites.
That even too with the visual media of stained glass etc. from the middle ages onward, the most readily available means to tell a bible story, that the story in the visual form could be interpreted and or have the message hijacked away from that of the poor multitudes down to vested middle class elites.
.
