Showing posts with label conspiracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conspiracy. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
Sunday, January 18, 2015
Unearthing America – One Shovel Full of Shit At A Time – History Channel
![]() |
| Cleopatra's Needle, Central Park NYC (Public Domain) |
Scott Wolter, the world’s leading “Forensic
Geologist” is forever trying to figure out if it was a cat or a possum that
shit on a rock in your backyard, is host of a History Channel entertainer “Unearthing
America”.
Working from and or for an unseen POV –
paranoid, white, Mormon-like, this clown has one of those background noise history
programs that sees conspiracy and the Templars and the Masons behind every bush
rock and tree in America. Kind of reminds me of my late grandma and her
paranoia towards the “Commies” in better American days and being fronted by the,
any unions.
Program last night was about Cleopatra’s
giant granite Dildoe in back of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Granite
involved here and so only a forensic geologist can say who or what for certain
has taken a dump in the vicinity of obelisk for the last 3,000 years. It was
stolen from Egypt in the nineteenth century btw.
Why is it there? How did it get there?
What is the real reason for it being treated as ancient art and behind the MET
and its nefarious and as yet undetermined hidden agenda of “Art” – (wink, nod).
Scott walks through Grand Central
Terminal calling it a train “station” and then goes downtown to St.Paul’s
Chapel and calls it a church. There is another secret in sight is the obelisk in plain
sight in St. Paul’s graveyard, a tombstone, like Cleopatra’s Dildoe in Central Park. St. Paul’s
is a chapel and attached theologically to the Trinity Church (Queen Anne
Charter) a few blocks over on Wall Street.
Cleopatra’s Needle lines up with the
Worth Obelisk at Madison Square and does not quite line up in a straight line
with the obelisk gravestone at St. Paul’s Chapel downtown but this expert knows it all, yeah right, between any two separate points is a straight line. That imperfect line continues and does not as his expert prescribes point to the Statue of Liberty on an island in
New York harbor but rather straight at Governor’s Island, the original
settlement point of the Dutch in NYC.
Governor’s Island is the secret hiding
place of the Ark of the Holy Grail, the wooden animal vessel that the Kristian
god Yahweh Junior drank from at some supper party once upon a time btw. Don'r ya know yaor bib-L?
And as I suspect the subject of another history
channel mystery/conspiracy.
This program “Unearthing America” along
with “Ancient Aliens” is the most highly rated cable shows on the History
Channel making it most likely to jack-off to while in your living room and in your underwear, from boredom or lack of concrete fact, while watching cable TV btw...
.
Monday, June 2, 2014
Breaking News - Bilderberg Coffee Klatch Did Not Meet in Copenhagen This Past Weekend
It is with
predictable disappointment to announce all four networks failed to inform the
public of a secretive and extremely exclusive meeting of central bankers, CEOs,
public officials and world dignitaries taking place this weekend.
From May 29
through today, June 1, esteemed academicians, hand picked journalists,
intelligence officials, world banking oligarchs and the CEOs and bosses of
Royal Dutch Shell, Google and Microsoft, to name just a few, slinked behind
closed doors at the Marriott hotel in Copenhagen, Denmark, to do God knows
what.
But watching
the major news networks and monitoring the domestic news wires, you’d never
guess this meeting happened.
.
Monday, August 26, 2013
Two Flaws in the Ted Cruz / Dallas Morning News Birther Conspiracy to Defraud the American People Regarding Cuban Canadian/American Texas Senator Cruz
Two flaws that any seasoned Birther Baiter of President Obama’s
Birth Certificate as a model should notice –
One - Where is the Hospital birth certificate – not this possible fraud
piece of paper?
Two - Handed Exclusively to the Dallas Morning New from Rafael
Edward Cruz hisself.
Two sources of possible fraud.
The issuing agent in Canada with an official birth certificate –
Issued 30 days after the so-called birth with no doubt amendments or
discrepancies mentioned on the hospital issued certificate not listed on this
later amendable document with a rubber stamp signature on it.
Exclusive use by the Dallas Morning News and Ted Cruz and company.
How many courthouses in Texas history have been burned down over the decades to hide less
bastardization of facts than this comfy little set up between the newspaper and
dear little Teddy?
What’s good for the gander, Obama, is also good for the goose, Cruz.
Lol
Come on birther folks, try and play fair and apply equal standards and requirements
on both politicians. Yeah right.
Have a nice day.
.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Sunday, November 6, 2011
Pope John Paul I – the last pope – the smiling pope
I was struck by some comment in some blog or in a “progressive” Catholic Newspaper that allows polite dissenting opinion/comments. In that Newspaper, the response was somehow related in the mind of the commentor to the current Public Relations crisis, not a MORAL crisis, in the American Catholic Church over one of their masonic like, magically politically like, connected bishops, Robert Finn KC/MO stonewalling the public over his criminal mishandling of a typical pedo priest cover up in the Diocese of Kansa City / St. Joseph Missouri.
The comment was from a female, and she said something to the effect that all the good will and hope and good Christian Catholic vibes that had come out of V2, Vatican II, had died with Albino Luciani and his “murder”, which seems to be a match for the popular meme opinion on the way the Vatican II spirit somehow got hijacked along the timeline thing and got tossed off a cliff.
And of course, the murder thing is retro-active revisionism, reflective of Coppola’s Godfather III, similar in fact to how all outer space aliens began to look like what I believe are called the “Greys”, after Spielberg’s landmark flick “First Encounter of the Third Kind”.
While there was a lot of behind the scenes skullduggery going on in the background of John Paul I’s short reign, I feel certain he knew little to nothing about the political forces, Propaganda Due (P2) masonic lodges, and economic forces, Banco Ambrosiano, in which the Vatican was a large shareholder. I doubt Luciani would have touched the arrangements that Banco Ambrosiano had to launder money for the CIA to the Contras and elsewhere in U.S.’s global eternal cold war against the Soviets. The church and the U.S.A. had a shared enemy, the U.S.S.R..
The contamination of church by the state, virtually little or no separation of it in Italy, began on the political end of it, by young Turks all joining in secret Masonic orders, in the Cold War, to protect the status quo in Italy. This all no doubt made its way, in a social manner, to zealous seminarians and priests, now senior Vatican officials and bishops worldwide – which is another matter I think but not unrelated to the present Public Relations crisis in the RC church. All going on in the background noise of John Paul I’s very short reign of 33 days. Sometimes a heart attack is just a heart attack.
And considering who the next pope was and how a Polish American PAC of sorts helped him to get elected with lots of American funds –
and how Polish Bishop/General Karol WojtyÅ‚a (VoyTeeWa) made all the right moves against the Soviet Union (as proxy?), and at the same time hid all the religious changes behind his vision, his march back to the middle ages that Benedict XVI so gleefully agrees with, continues with, I have to think that Albino Luciani, Pope John Paul I, was the last pope before this modern Cult of Personality in the Vatican started under media “Rock Star” John Paul II.
That modern media Rock Star Cult of Papal Authority, of noise, of news sound bites, started in the Cold War which seems to matter more to JPII’s appointed lieutenants and Benedict’s too, bishops with whom no common sense, human rights, human decency or human warmth matter. News at 11.
Who is this Jesus character anyway? Who does he work for these days? (Wink. Nod)
Unemployed? His own fault!
A bum?
+
Who is this Jesus character anyway? Who does he work for these days? (Wink. Nod)
Unemployed? His own fault!
A bum?
+
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Official Vatican Hit on JFK - Revised History
With fresh blood or I should say a fresh scalp (metaphor) of Bishop Bill Morris of Toowoomba on his belt, the Archbishop of the cesspool Archdiocese of Philadelphia emerges as Vatican spokesman on matters of a Catholic Institution’s entitled place on the landscape in secular America.
As Benedict XVI’s official hatchet man, apostolic delegate, an outsider, no doubt traveling on Vatican passport and privilege to Australia to do what Cardinal Pell did not have the balls to do and fire Bishop Morris. Bill Morris committed the unforgivable sin of using that indirect vagina word (women – Yuk!) in admitting that the laity in his diocese had (shut your ears) an opinion favorable to the dogmatically impossible concept of the ordination of “females”.
Since such cheap reactionary shots at good Men like Morris are rewarded greatly for traveling papal hatchet men, I can only assume that the Vatican has put full imprimatur on all things Chaput (bow your head!) past and present.
In what I consider a political mission of Charles Caphut, on orders from the Republican National Committee in the recent 2010 election cycle, I have reviewed one of Chaput's great triumphs in the fawning, drooling, dripping, Gollum like, catholic blogosphere.
And that is the revisionist history, and metaphoric necromancy, regarding the late (great?) President Kennedy and his speech in public, not behind closed doors, but to 300 Protestant ministers and his claim that he was an American first and a Catholic second, or some such nonsense in 1960.
In 1960, Kennedy sold the church out, sold his soul, and emphasized the famous Jefferson phrase of “separation of church and state” to verbalize his private, secular, political ambitions to be President of the United States.
WRONG!!! He was wrong according to this revisionist Burkite, of the Ray Burke fanatic fringe lobbying group centered in both Washington D.C. and the Vatican City State.
“Fifty years ago this fall, in September 1960, Sen. John F. Kennedy, the Democratic candidate for president, spoke to the Greater Houston Ministerial Association. He had one purpose. He needed to convince 300 uneasy Protestant ministers, and the country at large, that a Catholic like himself could serve loyally as our nation’s chief executive. Kennedy convinced the country, if not the ministers, and went on to be elected. And his speech left a lasting mark on American politics. It was sincere, compelling, articulate – and wrong. Not wrong about the patriotism of Catholics, but wrong about American history and very wrong about the role of religious faith in our nation’s life. And he wasn’t merely “wrong.” His Houston remarks profoundly undermined the place not just of Catholics, but of all religious believers, in America’s public life and political conversation. Today, half a century later, we’re paying for the damage…”
“The Houston remarks also created a religious problem. To his credit, Kennedy said that if his duties as President should “ever require me to violate my conscience or violate the national interest, I would resign the office.” He also warned that he would not “disavow my views or my church in order to win this election.” But in its effect, the Houston speech did exactly that. It began the project of walling religion away from the process of governance in a new and aggressive way. It also divided a person’s private beliefs from his or her public duties. And it set “the national interest” over and against “outside religious pressures or dictates.” –“
“For his audience of Protestant ministers, Kennedy’s stress on personal conscience may have sounded familiar and reassuring. But what Kennedy actually did, according to Jesuit scholar Mark Massa, was something quite alien and new. He “‘secularize[d] the American presidency in order to win it.” In other words, “[P]recisely because Kennedy was not an adherent of that mainstream Protestant religiosity that had created and buttressed the ‘plausibility structures’ of [American] political culture at least since Lincoln, he had to ‘privatize’ presidential religious belief – including and especially his own – in order to win that office”--“
“For his audience of Protestant ministers, Kennedy’s stress on personal conscience may have sounded familiar and reassuring. But what Kennedy actually did, according to Jesuit scholar Mark Massa, was something quite alien and new. He “‘secularize[d] the American presidency in order to win it.” In other words, “[P]recisely because Kennedy was not an adherent of that mainstream Protestant religiosity that had created and buttressed the ‘plausibility structures’ of [American] political culture at least since Lincoln, he had to ‘privatize’ presidential religious belief – including and especially his own – in order to win that office”--“
Secularism! Secularism! Kennedy started secularism! He was a bad catholic and worse than that a democrat! What a rare state Chaput had to have been in to, in good Chaput conscience, to examine the corpse of this failed catholic regime. Think of the opportunities lost for the one true faith to impose “religious freedom”, “catholic Sharia law”, and corporate tax breaks for holy mother church if JFK had been a better catholic - a real catholic?
How can any catholic vote for the secular democratic party of that womanizing male slut? I can only imagine the rare emotional state that poor father Chaput had to be in to have to dig up and examine JFK’s rotting corpse for the sake of the new GOP/God Party truth.
Saving the Catholic Kennedy. A Reply to Archbishop Chaput
”In other words, the Catholic Kennedy is alleged to have fostered a model of society inspired more by hostile French-style "laïcité" than by the "religious freedom" characteristic of America.”
“The dispute is not simply academic. Since Barack Obama became president, it has been at the center of the confrontation between his policies and the positions of the American Catholic episcopate, especially concerning life, the family, education.”
“It is a dispute that also reaches across and divides the Catholic world, in America and elsewhere. Is Chaput right in criticizing Kennedy so harshly?...”—“
“The dispute is not simply academic. Since Barack Obama became president, it has been at the center of the confrontation between his policies and the positions of the American Catholic episcopate, especially concerning life, the family, education.”
“It is a dispute that also reaches across and divides the Catholic world, in America and elsewhere. Is Chaput right in criticizing Kennedy so harshly?...”—“
“… Religious freedom – in the version of the Constitution and history of the United States, as in the British version or in that of "Dignitatis Humanae" – shows instead the possibility of a separation between political powers and religious powers without the indifference of political institutions, and without the public irrelevance of the Church.”
“Religious freedom refutes the very premises of "laïcité." Alexis de Tocqueville was probably the first European to understand how in the United States the Church "reigned" over consciences in a different way, because a reconciliation had taken place there between the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom that was unheard of in continental Europe….”
“Religious freedom refutes the very premises of "laïcité." Alexis de Tocqueville was probably the first European to understand how in the United States the Church "reigned" over consciences in a different way, because a reconciliation had taken place there between the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom that was unheard of in continental Europe….”
(That is it in a nut shell? With personal freedom of people in the USA already down the drain in the Plutocracy, the church is only concerned with staking out its entitlements in light of the reality of the new “secular” ruling corporations. It is every Republican man jack and bishop for himself in these end days of the end game of defunct democratic institutions?)
I also have to wonder if this newly uncloseted, once minority, now majority catholic opinion of JFK from 1960, may have in some way contributed to the assassination of that Catholic President in some minor way besides those already involved in that conspiracy to bring down an evil “secular” president in November 1963, aside from other political and power reasons.
“E Tu Brute” my catholic kinsmen ? (fascinating way of relooking at 1963 – is it not?)
Or is all this rhetoric and feigned Vatican style “scholarship” just more cannon fodder in the ongoing culture war in 2012 against another well loved “Secular” President and Christian in the form of Barack Hussein Obama.
Kansas, Chaput’s native state, went for Nixon in 1960. I dare say the attack on a disavowed Catholic President Kennedy, in the grave, is just a cheap parting shot in revisionist history against any democrat presently in power.
The regular GOP has been practicing this form of necromancy on FDR for decades. It works well on FOX NEWS for sniveling little cowards and demonizing pundits to kill air time. Now too apparently, the Burkite (Catholic), fringe wing of the GOP as well, has emerged after these many decades, and is actively part of the act.
Religious freedom involves respect. You get it if you give it my dear little padre from Denver. Comprende?
Whatever. Have a nice day.
Labels:
1960,
1963,
assassination,
Bill Morris,
Burkite,
Charles Chaput,
conspiracy,
denver,
JFK,
Kansas,
Luca Diotallevi,
Pell,
Philly,
Ray Burke,
Toowoomba,
Vatican
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



.jpg)

.jpg)

