Perfect Fit to the Synoptic Gospels - Too Perfect
Just as Bishop Lahey of Nova Scotia is apologizing in a courtroom, sorry he got caught trying to distribute kiddie porn, just as the most recent Dutch Church sex abuse scandal is breaking loose, Italian Experts (tourist experts?) authenticate the medieval faked relic, The Shroud of Turin, the so-called burial cloth of Christ, just in time for feel good about the church Midnight Mass services on Christmas Eve. The lie continues one more season in the eight thousand season history of the church of Rome.
It is the twenty first century and people are still clinging to an art fraud from the fourteenth century to stimulate faith. Fraud does not stimulate faith. Fraud stimulates more fraud.
The cloth, “the Shroud of Turin”, which has a unique image imprinted on it, put there by some lost process, is just one lone survivor of the thriving phony relic business of the middle ages. Enough pieces of the true cross were sold by the church, enough to build apartment buildings along with hundreds of gallons of Christ’s blood, were hallmarks of a corrupt age that preceded the selling of indulgences and the Reformation.
The Roman church clings to its pagan roots and pagan fascination with superstitions that equal relics with good luck and magic.
So now after many tests including modern carbon dating and putting the Shroud firmly in the fourteenth century, the RC church is selling the same old shit to inspire faith at a current exhibit in Turin. Shit that inspires faith is superstition or shit faith.
People, fanatics keep coming up with more bizarre ways that could prove this Bogus Turin cloth to be the actual burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth. Can I sell you some shares in the Brooklyn Bridge?
The Shroud is a fraud because it conforms to the exact details of the synoptic gospels, written fifty to hundred years after Jesus. Oral history changes over times. The gospels, their alleged facts are there in writing. Logic to me dictates that the oral history of the gospels finally written down would miss details or add them. This cloth does not challenge the established story recreated and finalized decades after the ministry of Jesus.
Because the Shroud conforms to an image of Jesus with a crown of thorns and a spear wound in his side and other markings on the cloth, that cloth was made to order. Made to order to conform to gospels which if you believe the Jesus Seminar only accurately quote Jesus eighteen percent of the time in those accounts written much later than Jesus’ lifetime.
If the most important part of the gospels, the words and ideas of Jesus are on shaky grounds, how can anybody believe the stage sets drawn around the words to illustrate the story.
So if you get an object that conforms to faulty gospels one hundred percent – it is hardly proof but a customized sure hit bogus relic.
There is some fascinating literature about the Shroud. Most of that has been written in the last forty odd years and concerns the use of analysis and science to disprove this magic cloth possibly originating from the king of all fraud – Satan.
The cloth, “the Shroud of Turin”, which has a unique image imprinted on it, put there by some lost process, is just one lone survivor of the thriving phony relic business of the middle ages. Enough pieces of the true cross were sold by the church, enough to build apartment buildings along with hundreds of gallons of Christ’s blood, were hallmarks of a corrupt age that preceded the selling of indulgences and the Reformation.
The Roman church clings to its pagan roots and pagan fascination with superstitions that equal relics with good luck and magic.
So now after many tests including modern carbon dating and putting the Shroud firmly in the fourteenth century, the RC church is selling the same old shit to inspire faith at a current exhibit in Turin. Shit that inspires faith is superstition or shit faith.
People, fanatics keep coming up with more bizarre ways that could prove this Bogus Turin cloth to be the actual burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth. Can I sell you some shares in the Brooklyn Bridge?
The Shroud is a fraud because it conforms to the exact details of the synoptic gospels, written fifty to hundred years after Jesus. Oral history changes over times. The gospels, their alleged facts are there in writing. Logic to me dictates that the oral history of the gospels finally written down would miss details or add them. This cloth does not challenge the established story recreated and finalized decades after the ministry of Jesus.
Because the Shroud conforms to an image of Jesus with a crown of thorns and a spear wound in his side and other markings on the cloth, that cloth was made to order. Made to order to conform to gospels which if you believe the Jesus Seminar only accurately quote Jesus eighteen percent of the time in those accounts written much later than Jesus’ lifetime.
If the most important part of the gospels, the words and ideas of Jesus are on shaky grounds, how can anybody believe the stage sets drawn around the words to illustrate the story.
So if you get an object that conforms to faulty gospels one hundred percent – it is hardly proof but a customized sure hit bogus relic.
There is some fascinating literature about the Shroud. Most of that has been written in the last forty odd years and concerns the use of analysis and science to disprove this magic cloth possibly originating from the king of all fraud – Satan.
.
8 comments:
Yep... that particular shroud, in that picture, is fake. Whoever heard of the word "fake" being on the Shroud before? The real Shroud is being taken care of, in Rome...
Yep, I agree with you. The word "Fake" was never on the original cloth, now in Turin. Anyway, if the original cloth is a fake, it's really a wonder how they had the negative imprint made in the 14th century without ever seeing the positive features, kept it for so long and only discovered with a picture taken in the late 18th century.
"late 18th century" - correction, late 19th century.
And a wonder how no one has been able to replicate the image in its entirety.
What am I doing writing a comment for a blogger who has NEVER seen, examined or touched the cloth?
LOL Anonymous 4:10. Enjoyed your typical Christian love. Have a nice day.
You seriously have a problem with deleting comments... I'd like you to take into account what RELIABLE sources have to say in your articles instead of mocking and making crude obscene comments... I found the article to be pretty childish. if you're going to criticize, at least be accurate.
The Shroud of Turin is a physical record of a spiritual event... the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The Shroud had human AB+ blood all over it, and absolutely no paint pigments at all. The image is imprinted on the very extreme outer threads of the Shroud. If there was paint, it would've soaked into the cloth. The only explanation for the image is radiation caused by the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. And, all the injuries the Shroud reveals, are recorded in the Holy Bible, like the spear in the side, the crown of thorns, the plucked beard, the whippings, the nails driven into his wrists and feet, etc..
Satan would never attack Christianity, by using something like the Shroud, that would only strengthen the faith and hope of MILLIONS of Christians, worldwide. Creating the Santa Claus and Easter Bunny myths are more Satan's way of directing human minds away from the truth of Jesus Christ.
I should also add, that it was determined in 1994, that the carbon-14 dating taken in 1988, which showed the Shroud to be from the 13th century, was corrupted. All the evidence still shows us that the Shroud is from the 1st century, and from Israel.
Post a Comment